Large collaboration with explicit correction responsibility
Real sources · Illustrative request · Sample version
Customer question
Hypothetical commission: multiple teams need an auditable large systematic review.
Who reviews at scale, and how are errors found, corrected or disclosed?
EOS’s internal system evaluation is a real process reference; commissioned roles, responsibilities and acceptance are scoped separately.
Own research: internal event disposition
v2 same-case internal evaluation: 50 root-cause events and 1,217 numerical comparisons. 46/50 is not accuracy, customer success or independent validation.
Analysis excerpt
| Check | Finding / sample content | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Review responsibilities | Assign screening, extraction, statistics and adjudication | Record owners and handover conditions |
| Correction ledger | Original/reviewed values, cause and status coexist | Trace corrections and residual limitations |
| Update baseline | Freeze protocol, data, code and source versions | Scope additions as incremental work |
Delivery manifest
| File | Format | Contents |
|---|---|---|
| Roles and milestones | XLSX / PDF | Roles, material limits, methods, reviews and acceptance milestones |
| Provenance and correction ledger | XLSX | Source locations, dependencies, disagreements, causes and disposition |
| Delivery and update baseline | CSV / R / PDF | Frozen data/code, reproduction guide, limitations and next-stage scope |
This is an illustrative formal delivery manifest. This pack supplies an HTML report, CSV tables and a source register. Agree formal formats, quantities and scope in the quote.
Acceptance criteria
- The research scope, roles, methods, and frozen versions can be checked
- Numbers trace to extraction and original sources, with dependency, exclusion, disagreement, and correction records
- Agreed professional review is complete and results can be reproduced in the agreed environment
- Acceptance concerns methods and delivery completeness, not result direction, publication, citations, or clinical benefit
Sources
- EOS · 可审计证据系统内部评价 v2
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.21.26363538v2