One perioperative case: trace three issues to original pages
Real sources · Illustrative request · Sample version
Customer question
A hypothetical firm limits the engagement to one perioperative stage and three questions: abnormality records, management rationale and alternative explanations.
Are record facts, medical inferences, contrary material and unresolved conditions separate for each issue?
A reviewer can locate originals, inspect evidence in different directions and see which conclusions still need individual-case conditions.
Three-issue review matrix
| Check / stage | Chart content |
|---|---|
| Q-01 Abnormality records | MR-07, original p.26: abnormality recorded; complete monitoring series missing |
| Q-02 Management rationale | MR-12, original p.41: intervention recorded; applicability requires contemporary evidence and expert review |
| Q-03 Alternative explanations | Review prior conditions and perioperative factors together; no cause presumed |
Questions and page locations are hypothetical. Full work follows the agreed stage, volume and 20-source scope; this page is an extract.
Analysis excerpt
| Check | Finding / sample content | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Facts versus inference | An abnormality being recorded differs from the response it should trigger. | Locate the first in originals; assign the second to expert review. |
| Different evidence directions | Supporting, contrary and uncertain material remain locatable for every question. | Do not omit material because it is unfavorable. |
| Review and changes | New material identifies which question it affects, with version differences. | Complete one agreed revision within scope. |
Delivery manifest
| File | Format | Contents |
|---|---|---|
| 01 Original index and factual timeline | XLSX | Provenance, creation/acquisition dates, original pages and fact categories. |
| 02 Three-issue matrices and medical memorandum | XLSX + PDF | Evidence in both directions, contemporary applicability, alternatives and gaps. |
| 03 Expert questions and revision record | DOCX | Three questions, necessary conditions, reviewers and one revision log. |
This is an illustrative formal delivery manifest. This pack supplies an HTML report, CSV tables and a source register. Agree formal formats, quantities and scope in the quote.
Acceptance criteria
- Each of the three agreed issues links to material IDs and original pages, with supporting, contrary and uncertain evidence and applicability. Reviewer records, open issues and version changes are visible. Litigation success, compensation and responsibility shares are not acceptance criteria.
Sources
- SPC civil evidence provisions (2019 revision; originals, electronic records and specialists)
https://www.court.gov.cn/zixun/xiangqing/212721.html - SPC medical damage interpretation (2020 revision, in the 27-interpretation amendment)
https://www.court.gov.cn/zixun/xiangqing/282621.html