One discharge-transition question, with evidence and local gaps
Real sources · Illustrative request · Sample version
Customer question
Hypothetical commission: a surgical ward considers social-support assessment and a discharge-transition pilot.
Do study populations match local patients, and what is missing before a pilot?
An evidence-to-local-context table lets the department decide whether further evaluation is justified.
Evidence-to-pilot gap matrix
| Check / stage | Chart content |
|---|---|
| Study population | Match age, procedures and support definitions |
| Local pathway | Confirm owners, referrals and data permissions |
| Evaluation measures | Define reach, fidelity and safety; invent no benefit |
Illustrative local implementation checks. WHO continuity guidance supplies a framework; no local improvement is claimed.
Analysis excerpt
| Check | Finding / sample content | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Pathway question | Referral capacity after screening is unknown | Confirm resources and owner before the meeting |
| Applicability | General guidance is not local implementation evidence | Flag population and pathway differences |
| Pilot evaluation | No local effect figures exist | Agree measures and stopping criteria |
Delivery manifest
| File | Format | Contents |
|---|---|---|
| Pathway evidence memorandum | One pathway question, sources, applicability and gaps | |
| Applicability and data checklist | XLSX | Population/pathway match, existing fields and missing data |
| Discussion and review record | Two discussions, agreed method review and evaluation advice |
This is an illustrative formal delivery manifest. This pack supplies an HTML report, CSV tables and a source register. Agree formal formats, quantities and scope in the quote.
Acceptance criteria
- The question, sources, applicability and local-data gaps are explicit, so the department can decide whether to proceed with further evaluation.
Sources
- WHO · Continuity and coordination of care
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241514033