Back to customer servicesPolicy departments and public health organizations

The same topics recur all year. How can evidence and meeting materials carry forward?

The team wants updates on 3 fixed topics and reserved research support for meetings.

How does this scope address your concerns?

You worry that an annual adviser offers scattered opinions without visible deliverables or auditable hours.

When this scope fits

A recurring decision agenda with 3 fixed topics, material limits and defined support roles.

When the scope needs adjusting

Unlimited urgent response, new large systematic reviews, field policy evaluation or delegated administrative decision-making.

REAL SOURCES · ILLUSTRATIVE REQUEST · DOWNLOADABLE SAMPLE

Three policy themes with an annual evidence trail

Download sample packZIP

Illustrative annual agenda

01
Q1 freeze three themes
Baseline sources, local permissions and meetings
02
Q2–Q3 changes and discussions
New material, no updates, gaps and hours
03
Q4 annual change report
Consolidate theme changes and next-year questions

Future maintenance illustration, not completed scans. Existing scope: four quarterly briefs, up to 120 new full texts and 60 support hours.

Check	Finding / sample content	Use
Theme 02	Caregiver-support evidence requires applicability checks	Flag new sources and local questions
Meeting support	Support hours are bounded	Record use and conclusions around meetings
Annual handover	The team may change policy direction	Retain sources behind each judgment

SOURCES USED IN THIS EXAMPLE

WHO · Evidence, policy, impact

Prepared 5 Oct 2026 · Selected references, not an exhaustive systematic search

Scope & acceptance

Work covered by the quote

Illustrative scope: 3 fixed topics, 4 quarterly briefs, up to 120 newly organized full texts/year, 60 hours of professional support and an annual change report.

Pilot reference: CNY 300,000–1,000,000 or more/year. Fictional CNY 300,000 budget: 180,000 for quarterly evidence and annual report plus 120,000 for 60 support hours; 75,000/quarter. A quarterly brief is not charged again as a separate topic.

Acceptance criteria

Acceptance checks topics, material limits, meeting support and professional hours. A lack of change is recorded accurately.

Checking the evidence

Volumes come from the current proposed pilot scope. The budget and scenario are illustrative, not a completed client project or real transaction. A formal quote follows confirmation of scope, data permissions and personnel.
Inputs to confirm: annual policy topics and agenda versions, existing reports, official documents and authorized data. Each brief retains search dates and source versions.

Workflow and inputs

From inputs to delivery

Explore the workflow and deliverable structure. This preview does not run searches, read real records or produce medical findings.

01 / WORKFLOW PREVIEW

Define the task

List 3 annual topics, meeting agendas and the acceptance lead.

Methods, sources and professional responsibilities

THE BASIS FOR THIS SCOPE

Why this approach? Inspect the basis.

Institutional decisions require effect evidence, resources, implementation conditions and local applicability.

OFFICIAL GUIDANCE

WHO Guidelines

World Health Organization

Inspect public-health and clinical guidance

Find WHO guidelines and review the recommendation questions, evidence base and intended settings.

Scope & access conditions

Global guidance is not evidence of local implementation outcomes. Check population, resources, policy and timing.

Open official source

PUBLIC DATABASE

Cochrane

Read systematic reviews and plain-language summaries

Explore a question’s research synthesis and the confidence researchers have in the findings.

Scope & access conditions

Plain-language summaries are public; full-review access varies. Applicability still depends on the population and question.

Open official source

METHOD REFERENCE

GRADE · Cochrane Handbook

Cochrane · Chapter 14

Show effect size and confidence separately

Present important outcomes, relative and absolute effects, available data and certainty, with reasons for downgrading.

Scope & access conditions

GRADE evaluates a body of evidence for a particular outcome. Database inclusion or one study does not automatically establish high certainty.

Open official source

These references support problem definition and evidence appraisal. Your conclusions still require project-specific sources and professional review.

The value of this commissionEOS retains agreed-topic versions, local inputs and advisory time, with bounded updates.

Annual policy evidence advisoryCompare alternatives and value

Recurring agendas should not require an entirely new search each time.

What to assess	Cochrane Response	Evidence OS · Commissioned scope
Service focus	Cochrane Response offers living reviews, targeted updates and evidence maps.	EOS retains agreed-topic versions, local inputs and advisory time, with bounded updates.
When to choose	Its specialist services suit formal review and guideline updates.	Example: three topics, four quarterly briefs, up to 120 added full texts and 60 support hours.

What the fee pays for: Planning reference: CNY 300,000–1,000,000+ annually; new policies, regions and fieldwork are separate.
Value beyond this task: Annual handover includes evidence, version differences and unresolved agendas beyond news summaries.
How to assess value: Track reused materials, repeat-agenda preparation time and expert hours; funding approval is not promised.

Specify topic limits, scanning cadence, urgent-request scheduling and procurement responsibility.

CHECK THE OFFICIAL SERVICE SCOPECochrane Response · Our evidence synthesis services

Reuse and updates after delivery

A year-long decision-preparation record lets new members see the evidence already discussed and questions still unresolved.

Agree reuse rights, retention and export periods, and future update fees when scoping.

Questions before commissioning

Does the annual fee include a new large study?

No. New large systematic reviews, field evaluations or extra topics require separate commissioning.

Can the adviser replace policy consultation or procurement procedures?

No. Research and discussion materials do not replace statutory processes or decisions by authorized bodies.

Can I buy this online now?

Email us your scoping request at no charge. We’ll reply as soon as possible to confirm scope and prepare a quote. Services, professionals, contracts and payment are confirmed separately. This form does not accept medical-record attachments or sensitive images.

Define the delivery for your actual question.

Add your goal, available inputs and timing. Agree scope, review responsibilities and a quote before commissioning.

Request scope & quote

Explore other situations

Policy departments and public health organizations

Two policy options: how do effects, resources and coverage compare?

A 2-option comparison, implementation and equity matrix, pilot measures and a record of expert disagreements for the authorized team to discuss.

Focused project: CNY 200,000–500,000; comprehensive project: CNY 500,000–2,000,000+See the deliverable