What benefits are possible?
Focus on outcomes you care about and distinguish relative effects from absolute benefits.
Patient-specific evidence consulting for costly and consequential choices: check records, compare routes, retain uncertainty and prepare materials for the patient and treating team. Pilot assessment CNY3,000; stage consulting from CNY29,800. Confirm capacity, specialist review and timing first. Basic explanations and records remain optional.
For your condition and treatment choices, systematically search accessible global medical evidence, verify sources, appraise quality and explain the benefits, risks and unknowns relevant to you.

Clarify four questions to support a decision with your treating team.
Focus on outcomes you care about and distinguish relative effects from absolute benefits.
Consider harms, waiting, treatment burden and reasonable alternatives.
Compare age, coexisting conditions, prior treatment and personal goals with study populations.
Explain outcome-specific certainty, conflicting evidence, gaps and questions for your clinician.
Reports identify sources searched, strategies, date ranges and unavailable materials.
Record search cutoff, completed-review time and report version separately; agree update frequency in scope.
Link key conclusions to original research, supporting passages and applicability conditions.
Confirm whether human review is included, who reviews and its scope for the selected service.
Systematic searches may still miss unpublished, restricted or unavailable data; reports identify gaps. Updating and review take time, and new research can change conclusions.
Inspect the value and deliverables, then agree scope, review and fees.
The records are hard to understand. What should we ask?
PDF and source table; agree inputs and review responsibilities.
One engagement and delivery; agree input volume and human review first.
Excludes diagnosis, prescribing and major treatment comparison.
Treatment options and expert views are difficult to compare.
Clinician and family PDFs; confirm relevant specialty reviewers.
Stop after assessment or credit it toward the same scope. Pay at contracted milestones; included review is not charged again.
View stages & payment flowExcludes treatment, tests and unagreed outside consultations.
Rare conditions, serious illness or care abroad need coordinated appraisal.
Milestone delivery; agree specialist availability, permissions and collaboration.
Confirm questions, specialty reviewers and timing, then quote milestones; new records and updates are separate.
View stages & payment flowExcludes emergency care, appointment access, enrolment and outcome guarantees.
Amounts are proposed references or examples. Formal quotes depend on inputs, questions, professional review and acceptance scope. Agree updates separately; the same work is not charged twice.
One decision stage is one work package. Begin with appraisal, then decide whether to continue. The contract defines each deliverable, payment and review responsibility.
Confirm the decision, deadline and service fit.
Receive facts, gaps, key questions and a scope proposal. You may stop here.
Receive benefits, risks, patient fit and a source matrix.
Receive review findings, corrections and unresolved questions.
Clinician and family reports, one discussion and agreed clarification.
Illustrative budget including appraisal; shows instalments, not a completed engagement or a standard price.
CNY 29,800–98,000 is the proposed reference range for one defined decision-stage package, rather than a fee for each step. The CNY 48,000 example includes CNY 3,000 appraisal plus CNY 45,000 subsequent work, with the agreed specialty review included.
Several proposals sound reasonable. Which fits this choice?
Patient-specific option comparison, sources, applicability, family brief and consultation questions.
Compare pathology, stage, molecular findings, comorbidities and proposed routes with studies. Retain support, risks and uncertainty. Treating clinicians remain responsible for care. Pilot stage consulting starts at CNY 29,800, with relevant oncology review confirmed first.
Disease guidelines make sense separately. What happens when they overlap?
Risk and goal trade-offs, record gaps and multidisciplinary questions.
Focus on a consequential later choice that can wait. Clarify conflicting goals, study applicability and specialty responsibilities. Emergency and immediate care take priority; confirm records, reviewers and the clinical deadline before commissioning.
Evidence is scarce. How much supports a new possibility?
Evidence levels, specialist/trial verification questions and a path to resolving gaps.
Separate case reports, series, comparative studies and trial status. Check diagnostic features, patient fit and unknowns. News and trial listings are not proof of benefit or promised enrolment.
If we spend more to travel, what is the medical addition?
Medical-addition comparison, cost and eligibility checklist, Chinese brief and English clinical summary.
Compare up to three local/overseas routes for treatment content, evidence and patient fit. Separate pending institutional eligibility, records, timing and costs. Pilot stage consulting starts at CNY 50,000, with third-party charges itemized separately.
Two specialists proposed different routes. Where is the disagreement?
Opinion–evidence–patient-fit matrix and consultation questions.
Compare the patient facts, study support and priorities behind the opinions. Commission within the major-decision scope after relevant specialist review is confirmed. Liability and litigation materials remain in the legal module.
You have your reports. What should you ask your clinician?
Proposed deliverables: a sourced record summary, a plain-language evidence explanation, and appointment questions. Undocumented information remains missing.
A low-cost, narrowly scoped support product. Explain existing records and relevant research for one defined question about one person, with missing information identified. Proposed price: CNY 99 per request, covering up to 20 record pages and 5 lawful sources. This is an automated draft, without individual human medical review of every record.
More follow-up records keep arriving, and you keep starting from scratch.
Proposed deliverables: an exportable personal record, changes from the previous version, and follow-up appointment questions. Existing records do not incur a repeated setup fee.
A low-cost, narrowly scoped support product. Keep a timeline for one person and follow 2 fixed questions. Proposed price: CNY 199 setup and CNY 69 monthly maintenance, or CNY 268 for the first month. Includes 200 MB of storage, one monthly scan, up to 20 new record pages, and 2 automated update explanations per month.
Consequential treatment decisions need both research evidence and a review of whether it applies to you.
National Cancer Institute / NIH
Cancer treatment options and clinical trialsExplore treatment types, treatment questions and clinical trials, then identify choices to discuss with the treating team.
Public patient information cannot determine your best treatment. Pathology, stage, prior treatment and professional assessment remain necessary.
NICE · United Kingdom
Recheck applicability when conditions coexistSingle-condition evidence may come from populations with fewer coexisting conditions. Consider treatment burden, goals, benefits and harms.
This supports the need to review applicability; it does not establish the effectiveness of a new treatment strategy.
NICE · United Kingdom
Discuss options, benefits and risksShared-decision guidance addresses benefits, risks, consequences, uncertainty and personal preferences.
This is UK decision-support guidance, not a treatment conclusion for an individual or validation of EOS service outcomes.
NLM / NIH
Check studies and reported resultsReview study objectives, eligibility, locations, status and reported results, then identify questions for the clinical team.
Sponsors or investigators submit the records. A listing is not government approval of safety or effectiveness, or a determination that you should participate.
Read the official descriptionThese references support problem definition and evidence appraisal. Your conclusions still require project-specific sources and professional review.
Describe the purpose, inputs and timing. Scoping requests are free.
Define deliverables, professional review, fees and acceptance.
Begin after contracting; agree update needs separately.