Evidence OSMedical evidence & research
Policy departments and public health organizations

Make the evidence behind policy choices visible, along with unresolved questions.

Regional pilots, policy comparisons, and ongoing decision support require different evidence, local data, and expert discussions. Define the commission by decision level and stages that can be accepted.

Illustrative scene: a fictional civic building for public-health and policy decisions
Illustrative scene
Service usersPolicy research, public health, programme evaluation, and decision-making teamsCommissioning partyAn authorized government department, public body, or commissioned research institution

Choose the deliverable you need

Inspect the value and deliverables, then agree scope, review and fees.

01 · DEDICATED

Decision appraisal

Effects, costs and implementation conditions are difficult to compare.

Core valueCompare policy evidence, resources and access barriers.
What you receiveCompare options under explicit assumptions and identify uncertainty.
  • Comparative effects and evidence-certainty table
  • Parameter sources and budget or option model
  • Implementation, applicability and equity conditions

Report, tables and agreed model; assumptions and parameters are reviewable.

How fees workFocused project: CNY 200,000–500,000 reference; broader work separately scoped

Quote and accept stages by regional question, options and local-data depth.

Scope limits

Excludes fieldwork, administrative decisions and policy-approval guarantees.

02 · CUSTOM

Living decision evidence

After a baseline appraisal, when does new evidence require reconsideration?

Core valueKeep defined policy questions current as evidence changes.
What you receiveTrack defined questions and explain what changes the prior appraisal.
  • Incremental evidence register and reasons for change
  • Agreed model or evidence-table updates
  • Reappraisal triggers and decision memo

Accept by cadence and questions; record when no material change occurs.

How fees workScoped annual service from CNY 300,000 reference

Contract annual questions, cadence and support hours, payable quarterly.

Scope limits

Excludes unlimited urgent responses and new large studies.

Amounts are proposed references or examples. Formal quotes depend on inputs, questions, professional review and acceptance scope. Agree updates separately; the same work is not charged twice.

What inputs are needed?
The specific policy choice
A pilot, comparison of options, expansion of coverage, or implementation evaluation
Population and region
Coverage, accessibility, resource differences, and equity concerns
Who needs to review the work?
Policy use, discussion mechanisms, data sources, and procurement requirements
More situations

Situations and deliverables

REAL RESEARCH · SYSTEMATIC REVIEW & META-ANALYSIS

Large-scale research. Reviewable work.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of preoperative social connection and postoperative outcomes. Explore the research scope, methods and limitations.

Explore the research caseAuthor-provided manuscript v1. Own research, not a paid customer engagement.
20,399Deduplicated records
445Included studies
72Studies in quantitative synthesis
NEXT STEP

Tell us the question. We’ll help define the scope.

Agree the scope, deliverables and review responsibilities before commissioning work.

Request scope & quote